#1 1929:b (07): This is an overstrike of a 1927 nail to make it a 1929. This has been reported by several collectors and it seems identical. There have also been one or two reports of a 1928 (07) overstrike of the same 1927 Nail? |
#2 1931:b (07):This nail has been reported by Bill Bunch, Dave Parmalee and a few others. The numeral three is noticeably different and curves inward at the ends. |
#3 1937 (06):The shank width of this nail may be both 1/5 and 3/16. There have been reports of both. Perhaps all are the same width and have not been adequately measured? But there are reports that the type (6) 1937 and 1939 are different shank widths and have different size heads. |
#4 1951 (06).This nail has been reported by several collectors. It is probably a valid western union nail. Among those reporting it are Charles Sebesta, Scott Weed, Dave Parmalee and it was noted in A list published in Nailer News several years ago. The question is regarding the point. Some have reported a diamond point while others have reported a chisel point. |
|